<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging: Comment Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rac.me.uk/2003/10/12/blogging-comment-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rac.me.uk/2003/10/12/blogging-comment-spam/</link>
	<description>Random ramblings and ravings of Richy C</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richy C. (of Richy's Random Ramblings)</title>
		<link>http://blog.rac.me.uk/2003/10/12/blogging-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-2254</link>
		<dc:creator>Richy C. (of Richy's Random Ramblings)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2003 01:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rac.me.uk/?p=555#comment-2254</guid>
		<description>It looks like Scott, Tim and Dave also got hit by the same spammers - but different IP ranges :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like Scott, Tim and Dave also got hit by the same spammers &#8211; but different IP ranges <img src='http://blog.rac.me.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jinjur.com -- Dear Diary</title>
		<link>http://blog.rac.me.uk/2003/10/12/blogging-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-2257</link>
		<dc:creator>jinjur.com -- Dear Diary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2003 23:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rac.me.uk/?p=555#comment-2257</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;double grr&lt;/strong&gt;

The porn spam is apparently hitting almost everyone who runs
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>double grr</strong></p>
<p>The porn spam is apparently hitting almost everyone who runs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reflective Reality</title>
		<link>http://blog.rac.me.uk/2003/10/12/blogging-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-2256</link>
		<dc:creator>Reflective Reality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2003 22:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rac.me.uk/?p=555#comment-2256</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Automated Comment SPAM Solution&lt;/strong&gt;

I now have a working captcha thanks to James Seng. I really don&#039;t care how much of a pain it is on the accessibility front, the spammers have driven me to finding a working solution. The don&#039;t allow comments from google searches hack also makes first t...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Automated Comment SPAM Solution</strong></p>
<p>I now have a working captcha thanks to James Seng. I really don&#8217;t care how much of a pain it is on the accessibility front, the spammers have driven me to finding a working solution. The don&#8217;t allow comments from google searches hack also makes first t&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richy C. (of Richy's Random Ramblings)</title>
		<link>http://blog.rac.me.uk/2003/10/12/blogging-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-2253</link>
		<dc:creator>Richy C. (of Richy's Random Ramblings)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2003 22:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rac.me.uk/?p=555#comment-2253</guid>
		<description>A bit more information:

Spammer 80.50.117.113 found my site on 11/Oct/2003 12:27:19GMT via the url &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.buka.pl/linki2/index.php?show=urls&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.buka.pl/linki2/index.php?show=urls&lt;/a&gt; using the browser &quot;Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; Win 9x 4.90)&quot; (probably faked) and landed on entry 118, but they did download a few graphics so it didn&#039;t &quot;look&quot; like a bot - although it only took them 39 seconds from first visit to hitting the &quot;Submit&quot; button.

Spammer 64.109.143.166 came directly to entry 91 at 12/Oct/2003 12:14:32 GMT without any referring information using the &quot;Mozilla/4.0(compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)&quot; browser and took just 7 seconds to hit the &quot;Submit&quot; button!

The other comment spammer, however, came straight in via the IP address 209.210.176.33 and started hitting the submit button (with no browser information or referer information ) on 10/Oct/2003 09:08:42 GMT, then again from 209.210.176.21 on 11/Oct/2003 13:04:27 and 13:04:30 and then from 209.210.176.20 at 13:03:59 and 13:05:01 and again and again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit more information:</p>
<p>Spammer 80.50.117.113 found my site on 11/Oct/2003 12:27:19GMT via the url <a href="http://www.buka.pl/linki2/index.php?show=urls" rel="nofollow">http://www.buka.pl/linki2/index.php?show=urls</a> using the browser &#8220;Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; Win 9x 4.90)&#8221; (probably faked) and landed on entry 118, but they did download a few graphics so it didn&#8217;t &#8220;look&#8221; like a bot &#8211; although it only took them 39 seconds from first visit to hitting the &#8220;Submit&#8221; button.</p>
<p>Spammer 64.109.143.166 came directly to entry 91 at 12/Oct/2003 12:14:32 GMT without any referring information using the &#8220;Mozilla/4.0(compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)&#8221; browser and took just 7 seconds to hit the &#8220;Submit&#8221; button!</p>
<p>The other comment spammer, however, came straight in via the IP address 209.210.176.33 and started hitting the submit button (with no browser information or referer information ) on 10/Oct/2003 09:08:42 GMT, then again from 209.210.176.21 on 11/Oct/2003 13:04:27 and 13:04:30 and then from 209.210.176.20 at 13:03:59 and 13:05:01 and again and again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

