Press "Enter" to skip to content

Richy's Random Ramblings

Film Review: Superman (2025)

Red bold text reading "Superman"
Title drop!

Whilst I’m not quite managing to watch a film a week (my wife has been ill with, of all things, Kennel Cough – caught from one of our dog’s inoculations!), I have managed to finish watching Superman (2025) – you know the one with Nathan Fillion as Green Lantern/Guy Gardner, Alan Tudyk as Four/Gary, Bradley Cooper as Jor-El, Pom Klementieff as Five, and Sean Gunn as Maxwell Lord: surprisingly it was directed by James Gunn who did Guardians of the Galaxy. I wonder if he has any favourite actors… Oh, it also has David Corenswet as Superman and Nicholas Hoult as Luther.

Casting wise – I think they’ve got Jimmy Olson (Skyler Gisondo) spot on: Lex Luthor (played by 36 year old Nicholas Hoult) is too young and doesn’t quite have the gravitas for Luthor – he’s got the “Modern Doctor Who Master” villain issue of “make him over-excited/manic”: I can’t see how Luthor would have acquired all the funds and technology necessary with that sort of attitude (and age: even if he inherited a large portion). David Corenswet as Superman is okay – they’ve definitely gone for the Christopher Reeves look and feel for him (hair curl, shorts and even the classic theme) and Maria Gabriela de Faria as “The Engineer” (a nano-tech metahuman) has got the semi-mechnanicalish movement, but didn’t quite have the acting ability.

A young Venezuelan woman with black braided hair, a close-fitting plackish outfit and tendrils coming out of her hands in front of a icy white mountain background. A young bald man in a fur coat is standing to the mid-back of the image.
Maria Gabriela de Faria as “The Engineer” and Nicholas Hoult as “Lex Luther” in Superman 2025.

As for the film/plot itself: It might have been good in 2016 – before the Ukraine/Russia War, before Gaza/Israel really kicked off, before Musk went full right-wing, before Covid (when you could believe the population would follow instructions for their safety), before “Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania” (the “pocket universe” being basically identical in look and entrance/exit method to the Quantum Realm), and before [gestures at everything]. In 2026 however, it all feels a bit too “close to home” with too many parallels .

A load of purplish indistinguishable shapes.
The “Pocket Universe” or is it Ant-Man’s Quantum Universe?

It also feels overloaded with characters (it’s a Superman movie – but with metahumans, the Justice League/Gang, Supergirl making a cameo – but Krypto was welcome!), some of the visual effects are a bit on the dodgy side and inconsistent (Superman gets thrown through a building but is stopped by a trash/rubbish bin?). Also – you’ve just established that “this world” has the help of Superman, The Green Lantern, Mr Terrific and Hawkgirl – but where were they in the big “Metropolis is being torn in half and buildings are falling?” section – are they just useful for “small things” like The Imp?

And why when the literal earth being split, did the water/river/ocean not seep into the rift? The “Pocket Universe” has multiple black holes for some reason – and they are quite large, but don’t seem to have much effect for their size. Also the portals to the pocket universe collapse if they have been open for too long: but the universe has a research lab with staff, a monitoring station with staff, hundreds of “larger-than-the-portals” cages (with hundreds of prisoners) – how, exactly, did all that get there? It seems excessive and a massive waste of resources for Luther to put ex-girlfriends in there: why keep them alive at all and if you do want to keep them alive, why not just a standard prison or basement – for metahumans, it could be understood for a high-security facility, but everyone else he has captured?

I did like the introductory text used to give us the backstory – we all know the basics of Superman’s origins by now and I’d much rather have a paragraph of text just ensuring we’re all on the same page than 60 minutes of the same origin story (especially setting up the metahumans have been here for 300 years).

Some scenes seemed to go on for way too long (especially the fight scenes – the Fort Kramer fight went on for reportedly 2 minutes – but 30 seconds would have been enough) meaning the 2hr 9minute (129minute) runtime could have been substantially shortened which might have helped stave off the boredom in parts. Why they bothered with the “fight interview” with Supes and Louis except to pad the runtime, I’m not sure.

It’s an okay movie but I probably wouldn’t watch it again (and if I did, as more “background noise”). I’d say I’d rate this about 7.5/10 : if they had concentrated on the core Superman movie instead of trying to relaunch the DCU yet again, it might have been 8.5.

Film Review: The Naked Gun (2025)

A red firey background with metallic like text reading "The Naked Gun" the "UN" of gun is appears under the G at 90 degrees as the joke is they didn't leave enough space for it on the screen.
Title screen of The Naked Gun with the hilarious “error”where they ran out of screen space.

Looking for a film to watch for my (quite possibly short-lived) New Year’s resolution of watching at least one film a week, I stumbled upon the 2025 The Naked Gun with Liam Neeson and Pamela Anderson.

Whilst it is a continuation/sequel to the Leslie Neilsen movies, I can’t say the humour was there – I don’t think I laughed once. I did spend quite a lot of the movie thinking “Who is the actor playing Sig Gustafson” (answer: Kevin Durand – who played Vasiliy Fet in the excellent TV series “The Strain“), I didn’t recognise Pamela Anderson at all (despite being a young teen in the 80s/90s when Baywatch/Barbed Wire was available: neither really interested me, but the she was plastered everyway) and did have a bit of a smile when Weird Al’s customary Naked Gun cameo was made and a little smile when Dave Bautista made his small cameo – but that was about it.

A man (Kevin Durand) with white hair and a some white facial hair in a hospital bad with a white and blue spotted gown looking a bit confused
Kevin Durand (playing Sig Gustafson) looking as confused in The Naked Gun as I was at some parts

Plot wise: Neeson plays Frank Drebin Jr (the son of Leslie Neilsen’s Frank Drebin) – along with Paul Walter Hauser playing Ed Hocken Jr (the son of George Kennedy’s Captain Ed Hocken). There’s also Moses Jones playing Not Nordberg Jr who is the son of a certain deceased actor from the original movies (a small smile did grace my face when they showed the “kids” paying homage to portraits of the fathers and Nordberg broke the fourth wall with “Nah” and a shake of his head).

They have to stop multi-billionaire Richard Cane (played by Danny Huston) from taking over the world – but all they have to start from is a bank robbery where Neeson starts off by being a 4ft tall girl before taking off a mask and standing up (but still remaining in a short skirt: oh the laughs that were not heard when he stood with his leg up showing his crotch) and someone dead in an electric car.

Male hands holding a rectangular clear plastic box with circuit boards, lights and chips in it. It is labeled "P.L.O.T. Device"
The “P.L.O.T. Device”.

Again, there was a small smile when the “Primordial Law of Toughness Device” was introduced (the “P.L.O.T. device”) but that was about it. It felt like someone went:

Pick from this bullet list of jokes from the original Naked Gun/Police Squad/Airplane movies – oh, and steal the plot of ‘evil rich person makes device for the people to kill each other whilst rich people hide in a bunker’ from “Kingsman: The Secret Service” – also include a rip off of the silhouette joke from Austin Powers 3 which would have been too low-brow for that movie“.

The movie was written and filmed and I feel like the feedback they got was:

  • Oh – this repetitive joke was funny the first few times you did it, but to still be doing it at the end of the movie is just too boring without a payoff…
  • Oh, and these jokes don’t seem to have a punch line – yes, I know the bullet list didn’t include them…
  • At least you’ve included the famous “Texas Switch” between Dreben and the stuntperson – what do you mean there two cuts between the stunt and showing the actor – the actor is meant to “pop-up” seamlessly behind furniture as if they had just done the stunt but it was obvious they hadn’t…
  • WTF is this three minute snowman section in the middle about?
  • Oh – the “getting the confession scene” is a touch obvious and the joke went went on waay too long without any payoff/conclusion: just cut to the next scene.
  • At least you’ve got the freeze-frame at the credits correct: what do you mean you actually had the image and everybody in it (apart from the main actors) not move at all – the “joke” is they are meant to be staying as still as possible whilst the main characters move
  • Oh well, let’s just release it: we’ve spent more than a week writing and filming it so that’s enough.

Not the worst movie I’ve seen (but I can 100% say it is the worst movie I’ve seen all year), but can’t see me ever watching it again.

Bug Report [Fixed]: WordPress Plugin “miniOrange Broken Link Checker” syntax errors

In an effort to prove to myself that I am actually trying to do work this month, I’m making a note of all the bugs in 3rd party software I find.

Today is a bug reported the developers of the miniOrange Broken Link Checker | Finder WordPress Plugin on the 11th June 2022 through the WordPress plugin forum about database syntax issues being caused in the version 2.1 of that plugin.

Windows: What ports does application/program X have open?

I recently had to help somebody with a Windows 10 based application which offered a “connection” facility (i.e. enter your computer’s IP address and port and the 3rd party system would connect to it), but the application failed to say which port(s) it had open.

Whilst there are a number of ways to view open ports – such as Microsoft’s Sysinternal’s TCPView and NirSoft’s CurrPorts – I wanted to suggest a way which neither required an additional piece of software to be installed and didn’t require administrator access.

Here are the steps to find out what ports application “AppName” has open:

Boiler Pressure Relief Valve Pipe – aka what is that small metal pipe sticking out of my house leaking water?

A slightly leaking Pressure Relief Valve exit from a Combi-Boiler through a brick wall

If you have ever wondered what bit of plumbing a small metal capped pipe that sticks out of your house could be, then that is the end of your combi boiler’s PRV (Boiler Pressure Relief Valve): and if it has water dripping/leaking from it, it most likely means your boiler has been over pressurised (i.e. you’ve put too much water in it) or you may have a faulty expansion vessel in your boiler.

Luckily for us, this isn’t our pressure relief valve pipe – but I did initially think it was (as it was on “our side” of an exterior wall).

The pressure relief safety valve (PRV) is mandated by British Standard BS 6798:2014 for sealed central heating systems and is intended to stop any excessive pressure causing damage. The small pipe bit isn’t actually the valve itself, but is just the pipework which leads from the spring-loaded valve within the boiler. Leaks from it could also be caused by the valve not being able to close correctly due to dirt build up.