Despite all the bad news currently going around on the main news sites, I still found an entertaining little article over on the BBC News Site: “A fish heading for slaughter in a New York market shouted warnings about the end of the world before it was killed, two fish cutters have claimed.“.
Why could this fish talk? Well, “many members of the city’s Jewish community are now certain that God, troubled by the prospect of war in Iraq, has revealed Himself in fish form.” God’s spoken from a burning bush before – but a feesh? Especially a feesh that “was eventually killed by Mr Nivelo and sold”.
God, if it was you, try an appear as a non-food item next time. Maybe if you could start speaking from banknotes you’ll get a bit more attention – and, if you don’t, at least sales of Abba’s “Money Talks” single will go through the roof 😉
News: House Cleaner
Ok, this isn’t technically a news commentary article, but the thing I’m commenting about did appear in a news paper so my strange logic means that it is technically news 😉
Anyway, just flicking through my local news paper and I came across this advert in the classified ads section:
I think it’s more a case of “House Cleaner requires clothes” then anything! Now, haven’t you got to ask at least two questions: If he’s such a good house cleaner, why does he need to advertise? and 2: If he’s actually good looking, why does he need to advertise?
Unless, of course, the advert fits in with the rest of the half page full of “massage parlours” and “personal services” from companies such as “Laura Kane”, “Bunnys”, “Moulin Rouge”, “Honeyz” and “Creme de la creme”: either Leicester’s got quite a demand for the 21 Saunas and Massage parlours advertised or something else is going on: but I’m sure that it’s all perfectly innocent, after all, this is the news paper that states under their computer section:
So: computer games aimed at Adults are out, but “sensual massages”, advertisements for bar work and tattoo parlour work, premium rate adult chat lines and “personal services” are in?
Hmm – am I the only person that thinks that that policy is slightly odd?